Adamski portfolio

A helpful place to also put any annual reports etc, of your own portfolios
Adamski
Lemon Slice
Posts: 787
Joined: July 13th, 2020, 1:39 pm

Re: Adamski portfolio

Post by Adamski »

PinkDalek wrote:
Adamski wrote:... Total return 10.3% (profits 8% + 2.3% tax relief in SIPP). ...
Well done but I'm surprised you include the tax relief as part of Total return.
It's because I plan, if rules don't change, just take out personal allowance plus tax free 25% from 55, so not pay tax on withdrawals. Although right could have left that out.

Gostevie
2 Lemon pips
Posts: 222
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am

Re: Adamski portfolio

Post by Gostevie »

Adamski wrote:
PinkDalek wrote:Well done but I'm surprised you include the tax relief as part of Total return.
It's because I plan, if rules don't change, just take out personal allowance plus tax free 25% from 55, so not pay tax on withdrawals. Although right could have left that out.
I completely agree with Adamski that one should include tax issues when calculating Total Return, in fact I am surprised that more investors don't do so. For example, I have been investing in VCTs for many years. In terms of capital growth, don't expect any, and the dividends are pretty good in many cases, but the tax relief makes them very good investments indeed for anybody who can hold them for five years.

In my opinion, one should definitely include tax considerations when calculating ones investment success or failure.

Gostevie

PinkDalek
Lemon Half
Posts: 6203
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm

Re: Adamski portfolio

Post by PinkDalek »

Adamski wrote:It's because I plan, if rules don't change, just take out personal allowance plus tax free 25% from 55, so not pay tax on withdrawals.
Understood, thanks, and the withdrawal aspect had also crossed my mind.
Gostevie wrote:I completely agree with Adamski ... In my opinion, one should definitely include tax considerations when calculating ones investment success or failure.
That part goes without saying but you seem to have missed Adamski's Although right could have left that out despite quoting it.

My point is that the 2.3% (or whatever percentage would be applicable) is available even if no investments were made whatsoever, which I'm sure Adamski understood. In fact the relevant % would be much larger if there were no investment activity! Maybe 20% on the grossed up amount, excluding fees, for basic rate taxpayers. Would you call that a Total return of 20%? What if higher rate relief was also included?

Your VCT position, assuming one hasn't lost the lot (which, thankfully, I don't think you do from posts of yours I've seen, maybe at Stocko), is an interesting observation though. Can you run me through how you'd do the TR calculations, perhaps in a separate topic?

Post Reply

Return to “Portfolio Management & Review”